Does your source
actually say that?
In-Cite reads the paper and tells you, before your reviewer does.
Paste a sentence from your draft and the source it cites. In-Cite finds the passage, rules on whether it holds the claim up, and shows you the evidence. Around that check sits the rest of the work: free search across 250M+ scholarly works, citations built from publisher metadata, and drafting tools that cannot invent a reference because they only use what you saved.
No account needed for your first two rulings · Free forever for search and citations · No fabricated references
What a check looks like
A verdict, the passage, and what to do about it
Three rulings, three different problems. This is the whole product in one screen.
Distributed practice produces better long-term retention than massed practice.
Source given: Cepeda, Pashler, Vul, Wixted & Rohrer (2006), Psychological Bulletin
The synthesis reports a consistent advantage for distributed practice on delayed tests, which is exactly the direction and scope of your sentence.
Cite as written.
Spacing practice doubles long-term retention.
Source given: Cepeda, Pashler, Vul, Wixted & Rohrer (2006), Psychological Bulletin
The direction holds, the multiplier does not. The size of the benefit depends on the gap between sessions and on how long after study you are tested, so a single figure misstates what the review found.
Drop "doubles", or move the number to a study that reports it.
Learners who study in their preferred learning style retain more.
Source given: Pashler, McDaniel, Rohrer & Bjork (2008), Psychological Science in the Public Interest
This source argues the opposite: it reviews the evidence for matching instruction to learning styles and reports that the studies meeting its criteria did not find the predicted benefit.
The citation contradicts the claim. Rewrite the sentence or remove it.
Example rulings, shortened for this page. In the app each one opens the passage it is based on, in the source itself. Run your own →
How it works
From a question to a draft you can defend
Search
Type a topic or paste a DOI. Results come from the open index of the world's research, with open-access flags and citation counts.
Save & cite
One click turns any result into a correct citation in Cite Them Right, APA 7, MLA 9, Chicago, Turabian, Harvard, IEEE, Vancouver, MHRA or BibTeX, built from the publisher's own metadata.
Write
Draft with your library attached. The writing tools cite from the sources you actually saved, so a reference that was never retrieved cannot appear in your text.
Check
Run your boldest sentences through Claim Check before you submit. Fix the two that don't hold, and cite the rest with confidence.
The rest of the suite
Everything else is built around that check
Start with the four tools below. They share one library and one rule: every claim traces back to a source you can open.
Find Articles
Find high-quality academic literature with source-aware search across 250M+ scholarly works.
Find articles →Citation Generator
One click from any search result to Cite Them Right, APA 7, MLA 9, Chicago, Turabian, Harvard, IEEE, Vancouver, MHRA, or BibTeX.
Generate citations →PDF Chat
Upload a PDF or Word document, or paste any text, then ask questions or run a one-click analysis.
Open PDF Chat →Library
Save sources as you search, attach the PDFs of articles and books, and read them without leaving your library, highlighting passages and attaching notes as you go.
Open Library →More tools, when you need them
18 more, all live today and all working from the same library.
We don’t publish invented testimonials. Real ones go here as researchers send them, with their permission. Judge the tool instead — check a claim.
Start with one sentence you're not sure about.
Two rulings, no account, no card. If it earns its place, a free account gets you five every month and search stays free forever.
Check a claim free